• home
  • upcoming
  • noori screendance festival
    • reviews
    • digest
    • journal
    • info for artists
    • education
    • partners
  • donate
Menu

loveDANCEmore

  • home
  • upcoming
  • noori screendance festival
  • reviews & more
    • reviews
    • digest
    • journal
  • artist support
    • info for artists
  • who we are
    • education
    • partners
  • donate
×

reviews

loveDANCEmore has reviewed performances taking place across northern Utah since 2010.

Contributing writers include local dancers, choreographers, arts administrators, teachers, students, and others. Please send all press releases and inquiries about becoming a contributing writer to the editor, sam@lovedancemore.org.

The opinions expressed on loveDANCEmore do not reflect those of its editors or other affiliates. If you are interested in responding to a review, please feel free to send a letter to the editor.

Dan Higgins' "In. Memory. Of." Photo by Dat Nguyen. 

Dan Higgins' "In. Memory. Of." Photo by Dat Nguyen. 

Dan Higgins: In. Memory. Of.

Ashley Anderson March 7, 2018

Dan Higgins captured the human condition in its rawest form in his new evening-length work, “In. Memory. Of.” There were moments of intense vulnerability paired with stark confrontation that allowed the dancers to unveil deep human feelings often hidden from the public eye. The 70-minute work was a part of Repertory Dance Theatre’s Link Series and was followed by a panel with Drs. Shannon Simonelli, James Asbrand, and Jinna Lee that unpacked the piece’s voice on the effect of mental illness.

As the audience entered the Leona Wagner Black Box Theatre, the show had already begun. Higgins sat in a chair at a wooden table facing away from the audience. A dark green scarf that later emerged as a motif lay in front of him. The soft rattle of audience voices painted the landscape - the dance had started with simple human connection.

As the five other dancers (Natalie Border, Micah Burkhardt, Jalen Williams, Bethany Shae Claunch, and Lyndi Coles) entered the stage, their bodies created a sculptural landscape. With simple walking patterns and standing sequences, we watched them move with keen alertness. At one moment, they stood at the edge of the wings while Higgins walked past. The shadow of his hand glided gently across each of their faces. A deep humanness was unveiled in intentaional movements such as these.

The piece developed into a series of duets, a string of conversations. All the while, Higgins remained on stage, observing the connections and interactions; he was an outsider who witnessed and watched, much like the audience. Williams and Burkhardt’s duet had a virtuosic nature that alternated between playful and aggressive. The two men began by running past each other with quick changes of direction and near misses. They chased each other, launched their bodies toward one another, and supported each other in lofty, suspended lifts. Williams and Burkardt captured both the strength and gentleness of the human body, moving like young wolf pups or brothers.

“In. Memory. Of” wove together a diverse sound score that featured several layers, from a continuing drone that intensified into abrasive, pounding sounds, to moments of silence characterized by the breaths and brushing of body parts, to Higgins’ deep voice that relayed a complex and vulnerable narrative. Each of these layers was developed in small pieces, so that the narrative was presented in increments. The story created then seemed to span a very long time, an unveiling that required space and patience.

The text, written by Cooper Smith and Mary Higgins, shared a story of feeling deeply alone yet finding a sense of belonging in surprising places. It was a story of experiencing extreme awareness of and alertness to the world yet confusing the edge of reality. It was a story that carried an emotional journey and exposed memories of trauma. The narrative was shocking at times, but also allowed me to connect to the words so that my own experiences resonated alongside the narrative.

After a section of story, Higgins and Border moved through a stunning duet. Their movement held powerful parallels to the narrative. I could not help but wonder if Border was a representation of the female in the story or if, in fact, Border was a manifestation of Higgins’ inner mind, an internal conversation physicalized. Their partnering was strong and facilitated both fierce and tender moments. The amber shadows of lighting, designed by Pilar Davis, bounced the reflection of body parts off the floor’s surface. The focused brightness captured the quality of light usually found in the middle of the night when the moon hangs high in the sky.

The scarf on the table at the beginning became another moving component and motif in the dance. It emerged as a safety net, an object of comfort that crawled across dancers’ skin and seemed to offer a calming familiarity. Yet, at other moments, it was a force of tension, something that pulled, tangled, and restricted the dancers. This simple object captured, and physicalized, the complexity of mental illness.

Higgins’ words, “The wolves always come to watch,” still resound in my mind. This phrase was followed by group movement - the first time all six dancers moved together on stage since the beginning. Were the five representative of the wolves mentioned in the story? Are we, the audience, the wolves, here so faithfully, only to watch from the outside? Or, are our minds the wolves, creating outsiders within ourselves? “In. Memory. Of.” offered few solutions to these ponderings and instead gave voice to the complexity of the human mind. The movement and narrative created a space to look at mental illness and the response of the body and mind to trauma. “In. Memory. Of.” uncovered the struggles that many may face but may keep private, laying bare painful, yet ultimately human, experiences.

Rachel Luebbert is a senior at the University of Utah, nearing completion of a double major in modern dance and Spanish. Rachel has also contributed writing to the College of Fine Arts’ blog, The Finer Points. 

In Reviews Tags Dan Higgins, Repertory Dance Theatre, Link Series, RDT Link Series, Dr. Shannon Simonelli, Dr. James Asbrand, Dr. Jinna Lee, Natalie Border, Micah Burkhardt, Jalen Williams, Bethany Shae Claunch, Lyndi Coles, Cooper Smith, Mary Higgins, Pilar Davis
Comment
Photo of “( ____ )” by Dan Higgins at the Great Salt Lake Fringe Festival. Photo by MotionVivid.

Photo of “( ____ )” by Dan Higgins at the Great Salt Lake Fringe Festival. Photo by MotionVivid.

Dan Higgins: “( ____ )” at the Fringe Festival

Ashley Anderson August 8, 2017

I stepped inside the door to darkness and intense humming noise, like you’d put in a movie soundtrack at the part where the main character is putting it all together to discover the horrible, terrible truth that she wants so badly to deny.

After a minute I decided to keep walking the same direction and hope that I would run into something and be able to turn a corner to get to somewhere that I could see. My bravery was rewarded with the sight of a small audience, which I joined to enjoy a captivating show as a part of the Great Salt Lake Fringe Festival held at Westminster College.

Organized mainly in duets, with moments of larger interactions, this Dan Higgins choreographic work featured Dan himself along with Natalie Border, Jalen Williams, Micah Burkhardt, Nell Josephine and Jessica Liu.

Jalen and Micah performed choreography in which they twisted their spines violently (which I thought must have been painful to repeatedly rehearse), clutched at each other desperately, and lifted each other smoothly.

Throughout this section, Jalen and Micah pointedly avoided a square kerchief that was laid flat on the floor. Later, Nell and Jessica ended up wrapping the kerchief around themselves and each other in a nice exploration of ways to dance with a scarf. Both dancers exhibited gorgeous movement quality, with unclear inspiration.

The kerchief ended up with Dan and Natalie, and though they didn’t do as much with it, the prop was successful in helping to tie together the various sections of the performance (which continued without any breaks for applause, something I very much appreciated).

The choreography featuring Natalie and Dan stood out among the short series of duets. They started with a stare-down from either side of a table with a chair in front of it, and made good use of these props without being overly focused on them. Natalie didn’t move of her own volition very much, but was more often moved by Dan in a controlling, maybe even abusive manner. Natalie reacted, but very much seemed to accept without question whatever fate he gave her.

Dan mumbled quietly and incomprehensibly at first, which I found delightful, especially because his volume eventually grew and his words were repetitive. He was telling the same story with varying order of events, like someone who was traumatized and trying to sort out the memories they had instinctively pushed out of reach. The haunting narrative, by Cooper Smith, mentioned running alongside a white wolf, wolves surrounding a small girl who told them ‘I’m lonely,’ the wolves eating that girl, and the wolves always coming back.

One of the most memorable moments was when Natalie was sitting on the floor, leaning against the table, and Dan, with a vocal outburst amid his story-telling, swiftly lifted her off the ground and slammed her onto the table. She reacted as if he had done something much milder, and slowly raised her arms, allowing him to lay the kerchief over her face.

Moments of quiet and stillness in combination, with the outbursts of loud speech and stretches of oppressively intense music, kept the audience on-edge the whole time, and I found myself gripping my wallet and not breathing very much.

Lighting also played a role in setting the tone. I thought it was most effective when a bright spotlight cast harsh spooky shadows on Dan as he ended the show by reiterating that the wolves always come back.

My friends and I discussed “( ____ )” and its potential meaning for a while afterward. The mystery was captivating enough in the performance, but to make it even more so, the title of the show is the answer to a riddle featured in the one-page program:

I was birthed in shadow,

nurtured by repetition and time,

I am friend to no one, yet I know many intimately,

my strength, invisible, yet I am more powerful than you can imagine.

I have no legs, but can be found anywhere,

Especially when the conditions are just right. just right.

You can be sure I am just around every corner, waiting to visit again.

I want to guess “anxiety” or “self-doubt,” but according to a preview of the show by Dat Nguyen of MotionVivid, Higgins said, “The answer is four words, often heard as an acronym.”

The best guess I’ve heard is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but even that doesn’t seem to fit the riddle quite perfectly enough. I wish the show would have led me to a more clear ‘ah-ha’ moment. But maybe self-doubt is just making me anxious about my guesses?

Overall, I thought that “( ____ )” was very interesting and beautiful, and I look forward to seeing more Dan Higgins creations in the future.

Kendall Fischer serves as the Artistic Director of and performs with Myriad Dance Company. She has also enjoyed recent performance opportunities with SBDance, Municipal Ballet Co., La Rouge Entertainment, and Voodoo Productions, among others.

In Reviews Tags Great Salt Lake Fringe, Great Salt Lake Fringe Festival, Westminster College, Dan Higgins, Daniel Higgins, Natalie Border, Jalen Williams, Micah Burkhardt, Nell Josephine, Jessica Liu, Dat Nguyen
Comment