imaginary manifesto

I’ve been pretty vocal about why I don’t typically post reviews of college/university-based productions. It’s because viewing dance in terms of pedagogy is different than viewing it in terms of standard criticism. But that doesn’t mean I’m not wholly interested in what students across the Wasatch Front are learning, thinking and doing. And not only the students I teach but also those whose productions I regularly attend. I am so interested, in fact, that the next journal out this fall will be centered around issues in dance education on a more broad scale.

So tonight I couldn’t help myself and wrote an imaginary manifesto based on the student works I’ve seen at the University of Utah over the past two weekends. This manifesto is based on nothing other than my experience as their audience and what I’m guessing they are telling me through their choreography. I don’t really know if it’s true, or if that matters, I only know that their interests reflect to me what mine once were and how they have changed. Imagining myself in their choreographic pathways is interesting and I wanted to share it.

an imaginary manifesto of 2012 bfa graduates:

We are not interested in revealing any direct premise. Instead, we are interested in how moving together forms it’s own premise(s).

Ambient music is a choice we make not because we like it but because it gives us ample freedoms. Anything can happen once it is on.

If the generation before us was interested in irony we are interested in sincerity.

We are modeling our dances after dances we think are great or inspirational. It is our reminder of what it’s like to dance even while sitting in the seat of choreographer.

We experience that everyone around us has huge expectations for our work but simultaneously hasn’t told us much about what we should do.

Physical prowess is how we identify that we will exist outside of this place even if people around us tell us dance is dying.

We don’t really know a lot about Ruth St. Denis. And you know what? We don’t care.

We imagine that everyone should care about dance as much as we do.

It is the physical act of moving together that we appreciate. And whether moving together forms a career or not — whether moving together forms notoriety or not — whether moving together is a luxury we will have or not — whether or not, it is through moving together that we map ourselves and you find us on a stage before you.

Aspen Santa Fe

Aspen Sante Fe Ballet came to Park City last weekend, and were well-received by a stylish audience. It was my first visit to the Eccles Center for the Performing Arts, which is a large, beautiful theater attached to a public high school. I have never seen arts programs so well-endowed in the public sector. Keep up the good work, Utah!

It was clear that this renowned company had been to Park City before, as the Park City Performing Arts Foundation gave them a warm and familiar welcome. A smallish, spunky group hailing from the Intermountain West, they bely their regional roots with world-class ambition and professionalism.

The first piece of the evening, "Over Glow," was commissioned from Finnish-born Jorma Elo, Resident Choreographer of Boston Ballet. As the dulcet strings of Mendelssohn filled the air, curtains parted to reveal a muscular male dancer, shirtless, in what appeared to be skin-tight denim pants. A plethora of quirky ballet-inspired steps followed, as other men and women took the stage, in denim and taffeta day-glo tennis dresses, respectively. Although the onslaught of technical prowess lost its appeal gradually, I never stopped marveling at the cool confidence of the women. One looked so much like Courtney Cox, another reminded me of Charlize Theron. It could have ended after that first section, and I would have believed that this is all the glamorous panache that Aspen could want in a ballet company.

It did not end after the first section, and to my surprise, I grew to love these quirky characters, and their subtly sweet duets with the butt-hugging denims. So much so that when one of them died, and her denim-man mourned her with such unglamorous, anti-panache, I was indescribably sad. His bare arms were like useless things, shaking and quaking in their confusion, when they did not have the job of holding her. He tried to drag her from the stage, and when it did not work, he stood next to her in his ignoble grief, like an animal mother over the lifeless body of a cub. Not understanding, not calling out, not transcending his grief—he simply stood. I thought it could have ended there, and I would have believed that this incredible turn of events signaled a brave departure from the typical narrative arc.

It did not end, but continued, and more movement followed. The story was absorbed back into compositionally-based ensemble dancing, and when the two lovers found each other again at the very end, I didn’t know what to think anymore. I guess it was perfect for the audience that wants pure-dance, a heart-breaking love story, and then pure-dance again.

This piece was followed by "Stamping Ground," the Aborigine-inspired Jiri Kylian classic. The piece, the dancers, and the set were all beautiful. The structure relies on sinewy and percussive solos and duets. Lines are stretched and distorted, pelvises are thrusted, dancers are forever eyeballing us with the curious stares of roadside wildlife. If you think we are odd, they seem to say, then why are you watching? The rippling, metallic curtains at the back of the stage allow for sudden and surprising entrances and exits; At one point, two collapsed dancers are pulled by invisible hands, sliding through the curtains as though disappearing into the next life. It seems that the boundary between worlds is both permeable and mysterious, and the dancers play with that tension, passing with ease to where we would fear to go.

Ultimately, Kylian’s piece is haunted by the racial overtones of a project that he documented in the film Road to the Stamping Ground. In the film, he describes his creative process in culturally-sensitive terms, taking care to impart that his piece, which takes inspiration from the movement observed in an Australian Aboriginal community gathering, is not cultural appropriation because he does not copy the specific dance movements of the Aborigines. He simply uses their ideas, which he admits are “surprisingly sophisticated” choreographically, to inspire a movement language all of his own. It is “his take” on their culture. I maintain the position that, in exchange, the community that welcomed him into their midst should also be allowed to comment choreographically on Western European culture. Perhaps a two week visit to a ballet camp in the Netherlands would suffice, and then they could present a work of choreography that is inspired by Europe. This seems ridiculous, but it would mirror Kylian’s intentions. I think that it could generate some interesting revelations and discussion, if undertaken sincerely.

Although this choice in repertory brought some heat to my mind, it was a welcome controversy. Certainly it sparked a lively dialogue post-show, whereas the final piece, the relatively lackluster "Where we left off" did not. In the interest of closing this already-lengthy review, I will simply conclude with my current mantra: See dance, talk about it! Be nice when you can and honest all the time! I hope you make it to a dance concert soon, and when you do, I will see you there.

Kitty Sailer is pretty much done with her MFA (thank goodness). Before living in SLC she went to Vassar and danced/made dances in Montana.

Artist Interrupted

Taken directly from artistinutah.blogspot.com Utah Artist, Interrupted (a chapter of the national organization Artist, Interrupted)  “is a group of local female dance artists aimed at providing experiences and resources to help women continue their artistic professional development while balancing responsibilities with home and family life.  As women who balance many areas in their lives, this organization is intended to support and provide short-term professional experiences that will offer performance opportunities, education, resources, and a supportive network for women artists to learn from local participants in their communities and continue to develop their artistic interests and talents.”

March 23rd and 24th marked the second conference for the group —  Friday night was the concert ARTiculate at Sugar Space and Saturday included a technique class taught by Robin Konie (play room for children included) followed with a luncheon and discussion with Jacque Bell, Sandy Brunvand, Laura Durham, and Eva Jorgensen.  Unfortunately I was not able to attend Saturday’s activities, but I will speak to the concert on Friday.

ARTiculate was unlike any dance concert I have been to.  First of all there were kids, and lots of them.  And these where real kids, so they squirmed and yelped and did other unpredictable things.  It was refreshing to infuse live performance with this new, raw, and even irreverent energy.  There were essentially 26 works, each taking their inspiration from a letter of the alphabet.  A ‘teacher’ opened the show with a quick lesson about the make-up and goals of Artist Interrupted, and later led the audience through jumps for ‘j’ and stretches for ‘s’.  The show included both live performance and dance films.

There was a strict time limit of one minute thirty seconds for each piece, so while of course no piece could really develop in the way that discerning modern dance viewers expect but this too could be seen as refreshing.  The concert was about providing ‘interrupted’ women with an opportunity to express themselves through movement, and perhaps once again connect to the power, freedom, and joy of the moving body.  While watching, I found myself being able to turn off (or at least turn way down) my inner critic and appreciate a collective of women moving and expressing themselves through a wide range of aesthetics.  Kristine Ward danced a solo (choreographed by Molly Heller), to a soundscore of her young family at dinnertime, all while with her nine week old son snoozed peacefully in a Baby Bjorn attached to her chest.  Elizabeth Hansen performed an upbeat musical theatreish piece with a kite, a huge smile, and an infectious child-like energy and wonder.  Sara Pickett, dressed in an oversized black hoodie seamlessly combined the truncated beat and articulated body parts of hip-hop with the ease and neutral performance quality of post-modern dance.  Kelley Glenn, with strong, specific, yet at times wilting and broken choreography, dressed in a costume and headpiece made entirely of newspapers (that seemed as if it would unravel at any moment), communicated a beautiful,  yet fleeting fragility.

This concert provided dancers, many who do not get to experience dance, choreography and performance on a regular basis, with an opportunity to do all three in a low commitment, low intimidation setting.  Utah Artist, Interrupted is a much needed organization in this state where so many of us still feel, or want to feel, like the dancers we once where, but work, family, or just the logistical practicalities of life are leaving us, well, interrupted.

Erica Womack teaches at SLCC and makes dances. She holds her MFA from the University of Utah.

RDT's Passage

In a recent review I mentioned the difficulty of locating a beginning while writing about a singular artist. Today, I eat my words and find it more difficult to write about a four-artist evening. So I ask, in advance, for forgiveness about the length of this review or its meandering path but I want to talk about each work on its own terms and also on the terms of the program which, true to the title, is a passage. The journey begins with the crispness and clarity of history, continues with comfort of recent classics, and concludes with questions from new investigations.

Passage was dedicated to the memory of Utah dance figure Susan McLain and the reconstruction of "Karyo" was a worthy tribute. The abstract forms and articulate phrasing remind me what draws many of us to dance in the first place – dancers can move through space in ways that echo daily life while simultaneously deepening the experience through the ever-expanding artistry of their bodies.

From this place of history there are the more immediate memories of "Songs I Wanna Sing (to you)" and "Ghost Ship" choreographed by Satu Hummasti and Eric Handman respectively. I confess that I did not see either premiere and I can’t speak to them as a true second viewing. What I can say is that they feel like reconstructions because each choreographer has gone on to deepen some of the idioms they explored in these earlier works. Just a few weeks ago, on a University of Utah program, Satu continued an exploration of text as it relates to music and performance while Eric dealt again with constructing situations designed to reveal virtuosity. Songs… and Ghost Ship also feel like reconstructions because unlike McLain’s work fixed in historical context, both of dances appear to be beginnings and as such they showcase curiosity about how much to edit and how to represent their choreographers’ own shifting identities.

In Songs… it is clear that despite the second performance some of the dancers are beyond their comfort zone. For a general audience maybe this discomfort wouldn’t read well but, in my opinion, it was a good thing. After seasons of attending RDT and feeling like I know what to expect, this piece left me with intrigue into directions the company could go. The technical range of the performers viewed alongside the vulnerable act of singing was satisfying, to put it simply, and I went along for the ride. While the oscillation between song and dance was a comfortable way to keep me engaged, the vast genres of singing illuminated the real lack of diversity within the company. While the company makeup is an immutable fact it was something I could not escape and my longing to watch diverse performers alongside the range of songs still resonates.

In Ghost Ship I have an inverse experience: the performers are deep within their comfort zone of intensive partnering and intricate yet full-bodied dancing but the structure comes into question. For example, I’m faced with the conundrum of choosing to watch rice do a dance from the rafters rather than watching the sheer physical feats before me. I’m also faced with the mystery of what exactly is printed on those costumes…in the Blackbox it seems like I should be able to tell but I can’t. Neither is a bad thing, they make me reflect on whether dance is enough and what, if anything, layered visual images can contribute to what I see on stage.

From these recent and not as recent histories there is a premiere by the collaborative team of RawMoves (Nic Cendese & Natosha Washington). "What You Leave Behind" is a true passage as it draws choreography from one of RDT’s own company members and features at least a handful performers that regularly perform with the choreographic duo. Seeing them in context of the program reveals the ways in which their relationships with RDT have fostered their choreographic identity – they know the strengths of the performers and cast them into new situations. For example, watching Nathan and Aaron partner one another was a rare joy and Toni and Sarah were both give precise and strong material that I feel they aren’t always given.

The criticism I levy however is that this interpersonal strength can, at times, become a dialogue that I’m left out of. There is a type of dance I’ve come to know as BOSWWIP which stands for “based on secret words written in private”. What You Leave Behind is one of those dances. The text, written by the performers obviously has weight and impact for each of them and perhaps to select audience members. But to me it’s a puzzle that I’m missing a key piece of. Maybe this is the choreographic point Nic and Natosha are trying to make but I’m not so sure; I think the goal is to have me find myself within the act of weaving of the narrative and that is something I hope happens more clearly in a future iteration of the work.

At the end of the evening it’s ironic that the most historical work appears the most fresh but it makes sense because it’s the most composed. The remainder leave me asking questions of how they are seen differently in relationship to one another and how they could be seen differently if I imagine them moving on their own historical path.

I close my eyes to imagine…

…how Satu’s work could translate to different performing spaces or dancers, how the songs she wants to sing (to someone) could change by the day…

…how Eric’s physical strengths appeared so close in the Black Box and how they persist in my memory even without rice, even without painted costumes….

…how Nic & Natosha struggle valiantly to create collective voice, a journey in democracy many have taken before and a journey without end…

Ashley Anderson

SUITE

In many cities it can be difficult for emerging and independent artist to find a venue to have their work shown unless they put on their own evening length concert, something  daunting for one artist to conceive of. Luckily, Salt Lake City has many opportunities for the emerging and independent artist to have their work showcased—from Mudson to the Sugar Show. This weekend the Sugar Space offers another opportunity for emerging, independent artists to be seen in SUITE: Women Defining Space. SUITE, an annual series that supports emerging women choreographers, opened last night. The series is meant to serve as space in which the choreographer can grow and create new work. This year’s concert showcased Cortney McGuire and Leah Nelson of fivefour, Erica Womack, and Laura Blakely, chosen out of a pool of applicants based on their idea, vision, and history of achievements. Each of the participants created a new work running 15-30 minutes long. Sugar Space provides each choreographer with ten hours of free rehearsal space, marketing and production support, administrative oversight, and other aid related to producing a concert.

SUITE opened with the piece sure, ok…bye by Cortney McGuire and Leah Nelson and included a variety of sections all revolving around the concept of social connectedness. The disjointed nature of digital social media was a theme in this work. One of the sections included dialogue that seemed to imitate various forms of digital social connectedness, i.e., status updates and tweeting. While this section was interesting, because of the disconnected nature of both the spoken word and the movement, the movement seemed to still revolve around one type of aesthetic, making it more coherent, rather than less. The piece was interesting throughout—taking requests from the audience for hold songs, talking to one another through tin cans, and on the spot choreography—but the sections didn’t seem to fit together completely, not yet. The intention of the piece may have been to be disjointed, but if so that theme could be taken farther, developed more.

In Laura Blakely’s Chipped Porcelain, the lights come up on Blakely with her dress pulled partially over her head. As the piece continued, this motif was repeated, embedded within the dancing, along with other intriguing images such as eating her dress, and stirring her “tea” with her belt. These memorable moments never seemed to develop, but to only to repeat without changing, yet they seemed to hold the essence of the dance within them.

The final piece, The Promise of a Daydream, included a wide spectrum of aesthetics within a singular work. While much of the piece still seemed to be in progress, the final section was striking. The single male dancer, Efren Corado, brings a boom-box on stage and pushes a button signaling the music over the loudspeakers. While this was disconcerting at first, i.e., why have a boom-box on-stage and still use the overhead speakers, this was soon forgotten. As Cat’s Cradle, by Harry Chapin plays, Corado begins a solo which, at first, seems unremarkable. However, after a few moments, Corado stops dancing, restarting the music and his solo. He does this again. And again. And again. By the fourth repetition, the solo in conjunction with the music begins to make its own meaning, about parenthood, about journeys, about life. And then the piece ended, just when it seemed to begin.

As a whole, SUITE has a lot to offer in terms of bringing emerging female choreographers to the forefront. It is worth seeing for that reason alone—but also because there are some beautiful, thought-provoking moments in each piece.

Rachael Shaw is graduating any day now with her M.F.A. from the University of Utah.