Bill T. Jones at the Eccles Center

Six panels of white marley hang in front of the traveler at the back of the stage.
They begin to skim the floor and cover a central space without quite reaching the lip.
Interlocking foam shapes lay waiting.
So does a small white table with carefully placed microphones.   
The physical and electronic instruments of Nick Hallett and Emily Manzo are to the right. Company members are invisible, preparing and bracing for a dance in new altitude.

"Analogy/Dora: Tramontane" photographed by Paul B. Goode

"Analogy/Dora: Tramontane" photographed by Paul B. Goode

It was a dream for Park City Institute Director Teri Orr as she stood before the Eccles Center sharing the many attempts that got Bill T. Jones/Arnie Zane Dance Company to Park City. As the show began, Bill took the stage to introduce “Analogy/Dora: Tramontane.” More disarming than a descriptive program, a choreographer inviting you to share in material is an excellent way to begin.

In his introduction Bill described how he came to interview Dora Amelan about her experiences in World War II. Dora's son, Bjorn Amelan, is the decor designer for "Analogy/Dora" and recently married to Bill; in Bill’s re-telling, Bjorn began to notice that as Dora aged, new stories emerged conversationally. Bill is no stranger to telling stories, particularly those of individuals moving through trial or tragedy. His body of work existing very much in relationship to broad social histories.*

“Analogy/Dora…” began with dancers creating tableaus by manipulating the interlocking foam pieces. The foam shapes formed windows, doorways, roofs, and other boundaries. Some of these tableaus could have been lifted from Jones’ other works, many including the same sizeable narrative arcs and containing equally abstract, precise and formal movement.

As the dance went on, the foam pieces continued intermittent transitions but were accompanied by interview texts. For an avid dance-goer it’s easy to recount a handful of pieces in this vein, most accompanied by a muffled recording or a singular and heavy monologue. Bill’s strategy was different, and more compelling: the dancers traded roles of Dora and Bill allowing her storytelling to ripple among the cast. This method of delivery also simulated the architecture on stage, reaching the audience in a collective way. When the story is displaced from its origins (a single Jewish teenager in France) the diversity of the cast in both race and physicality contributes to the concept of a shared narrative. The company make-up also lends itself toward the second and third installments of “Analogy,” which is a proposed trilogy exploring different personal histories.

Both the content and shared telling are at times didactic but at other times revelatory as the audience assigns how a narrative unfolds given our own assumptions and experiences. For example, one may bristle depending on which company member is the Gestapo, which is Dora’s sister in the hospital after a failed abortion, which is a parent, or which is Dora herself. The architecture also crossed into potential pedanticism because the pieces could have been, although they were not, placed in the form of a swastika. This line between instructive and illuminating is one Bill’s work often straddles whether for better or worse.

Throughout “Analogy,” a live score included traditional French and German songs and periodically interrupted the text with electronic music, allowing Bill’s signature movements to take center stage. These solely moving sections were striking as they exacerbated tension through full bodied vibrations and dispelled the same tension through sweeping yet distilled phrase material.

Met with a standing ovation, “Analogy/Dora” clearly reached its audience. As I exited through the expansive theater I remained curious not just about the work itself but also about the mode of presentation on the Wasatch Front. Most of my peers were ambling to their cars and heading back to Salt Lake or Utah County. The Eccles Theatre beautifully framed the work, but I wonder how vital dances by iconic choreographers could be more effectively presented by participation between additional arts partners.

Ashley Anderson directs loveDANCEmore programs as part of her 501c3 “ashley anderson dances.”

Most reviews on loveDANCEmore are also shared on 15 BYTES. 

*Most recently the company tackled the history of Lincoln which, along with another earlier take on “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” has been documented by PBS extending their documentation to broad audiences. The company has also created numerous works exploring the AIDS epidemic and terminal illness including “Still/Here,” which sparked a “victim art” debate after New Yorker critic Arlene Croce refused to review the piece.

RDT Link — Emerge

Emerge, an evening of works choreographed by Rodolfo Rafael, was presented at the Rose by RDT’s Link Series last Thursday. The evening was intense, beginning with driving music and a sharp spotlight isolating a group of dancers. One dancer shook as she struggled to bear the full weight of another standing on her shoulders. The supported dancer tipped back into the arms of the group as the lights dramatically cut out.

The intensity did not let up. Dim lighting, dark music, and prowling, smoldering dancers all said this was an evening of contemporary dance that takes itself seriously. This severity eventually grew monotonous but “Shotgun,” a work with girlish primping and lightly suggested Latin dancing, happily interrupted the mood.

Though different in tone, “Shotgun” was similar to other works from Emerge, featuring technically challenging and potential-filled movement phrases which seemed as if the shell had barely been cracked. Many works also made use of implied narrative elements that were disconnected from the movement, as if the two weren’t yet married into a unified whole. I found myself wondering what the characterizations brought to the work. Perhaps the dancing would be better served without them.

By far the most provoking work of the evening was “Avert,” an exploration of the devastating emotional outcomes of conversion therapy, a scientifically unsound but shockingly legal practice that erroneously believes homosexuality is a curable disease. “Avert” featured a sound score comprised of Arvo Pärt’s emotional string arrangements and audio excerpts from the film “For the Bible Tells Me So” that heartbreakingly described the absolute pain of being a gay person in an unsupportive religious environment and the trauma of surviving what amounts to torture while undergoing this “treatment.”

Paired with the potent score were heavy images of limp, helpless dancers being dragged across the stage and convulsive, disjointed references to shock therapy. Except for a brief solo by Elle Skye, the gravity of the text often overtook the dancers. Set to the tragic story of the chasm caused by a parent’s refusal to accept their gay child and the child’s subsequent suicide, Elle’s weighted, loose yet expansive dancing matched the grief of the story, giving even greater solemnity to the moment. “Avert” was largely overwhelming, in great part due to the painful stories shared. But a dance dealing with such a subject should leave an audience neither comfortable nor satisfied.

Creating an evening’s worth of dance as a budding choreographer is no small feat and is an effort to be honored.Though some moments were less refined, images of the evening are still stuck in my mind, especially from the works “Blink” and “Walls.” A single dancer, the entrancingly fluid Josie Patterson, surveyed the open space of the stage. Bright spotlights exposed images of dependence as shadowy observers haunted the perimeters. Creamy gestural phrases interrupted bound, static shapes. Both works revealed an eye for vignette and arrangement of the body that was intriguing, at times even striking. As Rafael continues to make work, these avenues are well worth his further exploration.

Mary Lyn Graves performs with Ririe Woodbury Dance Company among other freelance performance & teaching